- Category: Articles
- Hits: 2202
by Michael G. Sabbeth
Tom Bryant exited the shooting cage and manipulated a small device hooked on his belt. “I was losing concentration,” he said. “My blood sugar was a little high.” He infused insulin from his pump into his tissue, then wished me well as I stepped into the cage. I’ve shot with Tom for years yet had not known he was a Type I Juvenile Diabetic.
Diabetes is a pernicious disease that requires constant vigilance. Because superb information is readily available on the Internet, I do not address the disease’s severe pathology. This article describes metabolic processes relevant to shooters and offers suggestions about how they can achieve peak performance through proper preparation and treatment during a shooting event.
Carbohydrates – sugars, starch and fiber – are our main source of energy. Digestion breaks them down into sugars called ‘glucose’ when in the blood stream. Insulin, a hormone, enables glucose to enter cells, primarily muscle cells, to be used for energy or to be stored as glycogen in the liver and kidneys for future energy use. Blood sugar is the sole energy source for the brain.
For most of us, insulin is produced in the pancreas and released into the blood as needed as the glucose level rises. However, the pancreas of a person with Type 1 diabetes cannot produce insulin and, thus, the diabetic cannot process glucose for energy. The Type 1 diabetic must inject insulin from an external source to prevent blood glucose from rising to levels that can be fatal and to process it for energy.
A person with Type 2 diabetes produces insufficient insulin or is resistant to insulin and, thus, does not process glucose efficiently. As opposed to the Type 1 diabetic, the Type 2 diabetic has available various and less drastic treatments –exercise, weight loss, medication, sometimes insulin injection –to more efficiently process glucose. Many people with Type 2 diabetes remain undiagnosed for years because the symptoms are common among non-diabetics.
Normal blood glucose levels range from 90 to 110 milligrams of glucose per deciliter of blood (90- 110 mg/dl). The challenge for the Type 1 diabetic is to infuse into the blood stream the amount of insulin appropriate for the blood glucose levels so that a normal blood glucose range can be maintained under an array of physical and mental conditions. Hypoglycemia occurs when excess insulin causes the blood glucose level to drop below the normal range. Hyperglycemia occurs when the glucose level rises above the normal range because insulin in the blood is inadequate. In either instance, significant consequences will occur that, in the extreme, can be life-threatening. Severe consequences of mismanaged diabetes – for example, foot numbness or ketoacidosis
(poisoning the blood when inadequate insulin causes fat to be burned for energy) – are beyond the scope of this article.
How I Feel and Why
Blood glucose levels affect every function of the body and mind. An array of symptoms become apparent when the glucose levels are out of metabolic alignment. I wrote previously that Br yant noticed he was losing his concentration. Loss of concentration and focus can result from one or more causes, and when causes compound, the consequences quickly become detrimental and substantial.
Low blood glucose levels prevent the cells, including the brain, from receiving adequate energy. The body thinks it is starving. The person will feel weak, lethargic and unfocused. High glucose levels, the result of inadequate insulin, indicate that glucose is not entering the cells and generating energy. Symptoms such a dizziness, compromised vision, thirst and excess urination result.
Relevant to shooters, high glucose levels affect the eyes and diminishes concentration. Dr. Boris Draznin, Director, Adult Diabetes Program at the University of Colorado School of Medicine, explains that elevated sugar impairs the small vessels in the eyes and gets into the lenses, drawing in fluid and swelling them. Light penetration and vascular oxygen levels are diminished, compromising their functions and causing inaccurate information to be sent to the brain. Mental stress caused by impaired eyesight, somewhat similar to that caused by chronic back pain, for example, compounds the physical causes of sub-optimal performance. Blood sugar levels play a key
role in shooting because focus and concentration are vital. Br yant told me his vision is best and, thus, he shoots best, when his glucose levels are between 110 and 120mg/dl. He begins to get shaky below 90 and loses focus, just as concentration is compromised at high glucose levels. Br yant said he can ‘shoot through’ when he is low on energy but he can’t fight through bad vision. He cannot see well when blood sugars are high and when low, vision is compromised because he sees spots and flashes.
Mark Haywood is a long distance cyclist, a superbly fit athlete and a Type 1 diabetic. He experiences excessive urination and thirst when glucose levels are high. These symptoms not only negatively affect performance but also affect preparation for performance.
Dr. Shari Fox, a Denver endocrinologist, explains that at
high glucose levels, excess glucose overwhelms the kidneys and enters the urine. Osmotic pressure in this abnormal metabolic state pulls water from cells into the urine, increasing the need for urination and creating dehydration. A person feels thirsty because the osmotic pressure from high sugar concentrations signals sensors in the brain that there is not enough available water in the blood.
Another deleterious consequence of dehydration is decreased blood volume makes blood thicker – a higher concentration of red blood cells – and more resistant to flow, leading to poor circulation. The thirst and urination that result from hyperglycemia the night before a shooting event will affect sleep and concentration and undermine shooting performance.
With an understanding of the endocrinology of the disease, the diabetic shooter can now better understand why trying to reduce thirst and, perhaps, fatigue, by drinking a sugary energy drink will exacerbate rather than reduce the diabetic symptoms. Thirst and fatigue will increase because the blood sugar will spike. More insulin will be required to counter the high sugar levels, which then risks low glucose levels from excess insulin, continuing the destructive cycle.
Mark Haywood emphasizes the need for ‘tight control,’ the ability of the diabetic to keep glucose at normal or near-normal levels at all times. Tight control enhances a person’s sensitivity to small changes in glucose levels, enabling the diabetic to take small actions to achieve normal glucose levels rather than dramatic ones, thereby reducing the risk of a trampoline effect of repeatedly bouncing from high to low.
Doing and Attitude
All calories are not equal. They have different effects on insulin production in the non-diabetic and different insulin process requirements for all persons. Thus,diabeticshootersshould become familiar with the Glycemic Index (GI), a sliding scale that ranks how different carbohydrates influence insulin production. Knowing the insulin response of a food helps predict blood sugar responses to insulin.
In the non-diabetic, foods and drinks with a high GI trigger a significant insulin response from the pancreas. In the diabetic, high GI carbohydrates require more insulin to be injected in order to process them.
In general, food with a low GI, and thus, a lower insulin response, are preferable for diabetics because they can be processed into energy with smaller amounts of insulin.
This results in a more normal metabolic state, sustained energy and consistent mental alertness.
Here’s how to apply the GI to the diabetic shooter. As a snack, it is preferable to eat the same amount of carbohydrates in the form of a peach (GI 28) than jellybeans, (GI 80). Similarly, if thirsty, it is preferable to drink water than a sugary energy drink.
A consistent disciplined routine is key to the diabetic’s success in life generally and in shooting sports specifically. Preparation is important, as illustrated by the need to control glucose levels the night before a shooting event. Mark Haywood takes notes on his blood sugars before, during and after every athletic event and reviews them to replicate all the variables that were successful in controlling his glucose levels. He then can make adjustments for future treatment.
Tom Bryant’s food intake is routinized and consistent. In the morning he eats a peanut butter and honey sandwich and drinks coffee – always with the same amount of sugar. “If I take too much insulin in the morning,” Bryant said, “I tank bythetimeIgettotheshoot.”
Bryant integrates many variables into his pre-shooting and shooting routines – how many hours he must travel to the range, whether he will walk or use a cart, whether the shoot is half a day or a full day. He starts a shoot with his blood sugar a little high, knowing it will drop into normal range as he walks around.
He brings snacks of dried fruit, granola bars (low GI) and commercial low-carbohydrate drinks containing electrolytes. He checks his blood sugar level several times during the day and carries about fifteen grams of a high GI carbohydrate – glucose tablets, candy – just in case he miscalculates and goes low.
The insulin pump has been a blessing for Bryant because it keeps the glucose levels smooth and additional insulin is easy to infuse. He told me, “I am a master of no will power! Now I can eat whatever I want and just shoot up a little more.” He’s been a diabetic for more than half a century, but, he told me, “I’m better than I’ve ever been and having more fun. The pump has made it possible to compete at a higher level. I’m thankfulforwhatIhave.”
Colleague Steve Bieringer is a Type 1 diabetic, a cyclist and part of the legal staff of the American Diabetes Association. He emphasizes the importance of a positive attitude. He ignores the dismal advertisements of the dangers of diabetes. He’s motivated by positive reinforcement derived from the success of people despite their diabetes. He told me, “We’re ordinary people going through life having been dealt a bad hand. You work and take care of yourself and your responsibilities. That’s motivating. I won’t allow diabetes to undermine what I value.”
Diabetes, especially Type 1, is a difficult disease that demands near constant attention. However, with control and preparation, there’s no reason why diabetes should interfere with your fun or compromise your shooting performance. Type 1 diabetic Gary Hall Jr. won ten Olympic swimming medals. Type 1 diabetic Jay Cutler quarterbacks the Chicago Bears. Hundreds of Type 1 diabetics successfully compete in Iron Man Triathlons. Don’t let diabetes prevent you from getting your gold medal.
- Category: Articles
- Hits: 5769
Hunters are accused of lacking compassion, of being heartless uncaring murderers of beautiful animals. These accusations are among the most vicious in our hypersensitive culture, comparable to saying someone is a racist or doesn’t recycle. Hunters’ neck hair sticks up like striking cobras as they try to fend off the assaults. “My money preserves habitat; my money manages game animals! I care!” they soulfully cry out. Hunters are correct yet they lose.
I have seen pro-hunter / pro-firearms debaters, who have more brains in their urine samples than their opponents have brains, lose the debates. We have the facts, logic and morality on our side, yet we lose! Why? Because most hunter advocates have not learned this important skill: how to fight back by evaluating the consequences of anti-hunting policies using the language of the attackers. When we use this technique, we undermine the attacks and turn the tables on the attackers.
Do hunters lack compassion? An examination of three situations shows conclusively that hunters have compassion and anti-hunters do not.
1. The brutal winter of 2008 in Gunnison, Colorado risked the deaths of a majority of deer and elk. Government agencies, hunters and businesses contributed money to buy and distribute food. Appeals for assistance to so-called ‘animal rights’ groups, PETA, HSUS, among others, were rebuffed. The rationale of the refusing organizations: they would be saving the animals only so hunters could kill them later.
2. In 2014, under the auspices of The Dallas Safari Club, an auction was held to hunt one mature non-reproducing black rhinoceros in Namibia. The proceeds of the hunt would fund anti-poaching programs, clean water facilities, protect younger vulnerable rhinos and provide food for the villagers. This auction was viciously attacked by anti-hunters with tactics that included death threats to DSC staff and to hunters.
3. The demagoguery following the death of Cecil the Lion in Zimbabwe created a “Cecil Effect” of losing hunters, revenue, food for orphanages and the need to cull two hundred lions which generated no revenue but which increased poaching.
What can we learn? Increased animal deaths, poverty, poaching and revenue loss result from the anti-hunting policies. But more profound lessons can be learned. Compassion, born of Latin roots, has two components: a feeling of sympathy for another coupled with a desire to alleviate the suffering. Compassion, then, requires both empathy and a desire to act on that empathy.
You see the problem with compassion? Compassion, a noble concept in theory, is easily abused and manipulated because it doesn’t require anyone to do anything! You can be judged as compassionate based on feelings alone. Compassion can be morality on the cheap. As Aristotle wrote, “It is easy to be moral in your sleep.”My key point: hunters are accused of lacking compassion because they kill animals, yet the anti-hunter smugly views himself as compassionate without any regard to the destructive real-life consequences of his actions and beliefs. In the examples above, more animals died and more animals will die (and human suffering increases) as a direct consequence of the so-called compassion of these anti-hunting pressure groups. But the anti-hunter does not care! Reality and truth are irrelevant. Feeling good is more important than doing good. Keeping animals alive is the measure of compassion for animals. Hunters possess true compassion. But we need to make the best arguments to show why we deserve to win the debate.
- Category: Articles
- Hits: 4367
by Michael G. Sabbeth
I watched Teknys shotguns being made about a year ago during a tour of Beretta’s main production facility in Gardone, Val Trompia. Production of the receivers was most intriguing. Billets of nickel chromium steel were stacked in a rack about ten slots wide and twenty high – gleaming in the direct overhead sunlight like precious bullion bars.
The long extension arm of the massive bright yellow robot removed a billet from a slot, and, in spastic bursts, moved it at changing angles for the drills to cut, shape and polish the steel. Machined to tolerances of about 1/10,000 of an inch, the completed receiver was returned to rack and, with computerized precision, the robotic arm withdrew another raw billet.
I became a fan of the Teknys shotgun series several years ago when I bought a 20 gauge sporting clays model. I was thus enthused to test the Teknys Gold Target and to share my impressions and observations. I provide a brief
history of the Teknys to illustrate the upgrades in the Gold Target model and then describe the shooting regimen I used to test it. Comments about the gun from novice shooters to well-seasoned coaches, in addition to my own, add to the evaluation of this shotgun.
As always when writing about Beretta guns, I obtained background information on the Teknys Gold Target model from Jarno Antonelli, the brilliant marketing manager with the fifty gigabyte brain at Beretta’s main office in Gardone. The name ‘Teknys’ was coined by Beretta to capture overtones of technology, research and innovation combined with practical experiences from the field and clay target courses.
The origin of the Teknys is the AL391 Urika (AL stands for Automatico Leggero – Lightweight Automatic) designed in 2000 and which replaced the AL390 series that was manufactured commencing in 1994. The Beretta family, primarily President Ugo Gussalli Beretta and son Franco, wanted a semi-auto shotgun series more refined than the Urika. Their collaborative efforts with dozens of engineers and research managers and designers resulted in the Teknys series, introduced in 2002.
Design advances included a receiver with a highly scratch and corrosion resistant nickel- based finish, a new gas valve design to reduce maintenance, a new barrel profile (Optima Bore), new choke tubes (Optima Choke), new recoil pad (Gel tek) and a luminous front sight (Truglo type).
Other changes enhanced the gun’s elegance and aesthetics – such as an innovative wood finish for the standard version (X-Tra Wood), an up-graded oil-finished wood for the Gold models, a green enamel insert for the Teknys field version and a blue enamel insert for the competition configuration. A new checkering pattern was also introduced.
As with all Urika and Teknys model, the Gold Target employs a self-compensating gas operating system. Gas from the fired cartridge cycles the action by being vented through the spring-loaded valve in the cylinder. The system adjusts automatically to the pressures of each cartridge, thereby achieving flawless and reliable performance with an array of shot loads ranging from 24 to 57 grams of any factory cartridge or equivalent. This gas system offers exceptional recoil reduction.
The Gold Target features Optima Bore barrels and Optima Choke tubes. These 12 gauge barrels have internal profiles of 18.6 mm of diameter (0.732 in.) whereas conventional barrels normally have 18.3/18.4 mm (0.720/0.724 in) diameters. The Optima Bore profile has been specifically designed for competition purposes. Beretta claims that its design considerably improves shot pattern distribution, felt recoil reduction and shot velocity optimization.
The Optima Bore barrel only accepts Optima choke tubes. The five choke tubes included with the gun are longer and slimmer compared to the traditional Beretta Mobilchoke tubes. Their internal profile is designed to enhance the concentration and distribution of shot patterns. Barrels and chokes handle steel shot.
Unlike previous Teknys models, the Gold Target has the same improved spinning and self- cleaning valve system as the Urika 2. As gas pressure is fed into the
gas cylinder, a series of expandable fingers on the piston expand outwardly to clean the gas cylinder as the action cycles. During cycling, the piston spins, causing the sharp ‘scraper teeth’ on its leading edge to cut into, dislodge and remove carbon deposits on the cylinder’s forward interior section. This improved cleaning action greatly contributes to enhanced reliability and longer functioning shooting periods between cleaning.
The four major enhancements of the Gold Target model elevate it to an out-of-the-box world-class target shotgun suitable for all clay target disciplines. The Gold Target has the Beretta Balance System to alter forward weight by adding an additional cap to the base forend cap. Three weights are provided, 10, 70 and 110 grams.
Beretta has added to the Gold Target an adjustable stock with a memory system. Comb height and cast-on and cast-off settings can be easily changed by using the patented locking design of the memory system. The device is made from a carbon reinforced technopolymer for durability.
Comb adjustments are made within seconds by inserting the supplied hexagonal key into slots in the device and loosening and tightening as desired. Cast- on and cast-off adjustments are equally easy but require the removal of the comb.
The shotgun is supplied with a second rib, 10 mm wide and slightly stepped to the rear. Whereas the rib mounted on the gun is designed to shoot a 50% pattern over the aiming point, the second rib is designed to shoot 70% above the point of aim. I confess I shot only a few rounds using the second rib. I did not count pellet holes on the pattern board but my observation led me to conclude that the percentage distribution as described was reasonably accurate.
The engineering design of this rib system is creative in its durability and simplicity. With the barrel removed from the receiver, only thirty seconds or so are needed to remove and replace the ribs. A disassembly punch tool is inserted in a slot on the rib located a few millimeters behind the front bead and used to slide the locking metal strip rearward. By special order, two other ribs are available, one yielding a pattern 60% over point of aim and another yielding an 80% pattern over point of aim. (Please note that the ribs are not interchangeable with the Teknys Gold Sporting or Trap ribs.)
The system I found most impressive is the Recoil Reduction System. It is a removable spring- mass recoil reduction device installed in the stock, just above and going rearward from the pistol grip. As I describe in detail later, it is stunningly effective. Combined with the inherent recoil absorbing qualities of the self-compensating gas system, it is difficult to imagine a softer shooting shotgun.
A few other features of the gun merit mention. The Gold Target, only available in 30" and retailing for $2100, boasts a select oil- finished walnut buttstock and forend, which is slimmer than standard Beretta Urika and Teknys forends. It has a 3 inch chamber, a
cross bolt reversible for left- handed shooters, a quick bolt release that can be easily installed, a white front bead and a steel mid bead and weighs, with the light forend cap, eight pounds. The gun also offers the shim buttstock adjustment system found in all Urkia and Teknys models. The gun is packed in a high-density plastic carrying case which includes a bottle of Beretta oil and an array of tools.
My plan for thoroughly testing the Gold Target had several components. I wanted to use a broad spectrum of factory and hand-loaded cartridges of dramatically different pressures, velocities and weights to experience their effects on recoil and the reliability of the gun cycling the different loads. I also intended to compare the recoil of the Gold Target with that of my own and older Urika model and with my eight-pound plus 12-gauge over/under target shotgun. Finally, in addition to my own testing, I wanted other shooters, from novice to experienced, to shoot the gun and give me their assessments.
To achieve the first requirement, I sought the support of colleagues from several ammunition manufacturers
with whom I’ve worked over the years – Jason Nash from Federal Ammunition, Patrick Thomas at Rio Ammunition, Jonathan Harling at Chevalier Advertising who represents Winchester Ammunition and Jackie Stenton at Fiocchi USA. Chris Hodgdon of Hodgdon Powder sent me supplies of several powders for crafting hand loads. About sixteen different factory and hand loads were used in testing.
To fulfill the third requirement, I visited three of the fine clay target ranges within an hour of my home that collectively offered trap and sporting and skeet formats – my thanks to Mark and Brenda Moore at Kiowa Creek Sporting Clays, Doug Kraft at Colorado
Clays and Jerry William at Quail Run.
To help me test the Gold Target, Doug at Colorado Clays hooked me up with several highly skilled competitive trap shooters. At Kiowa Creek I spent an hour shooting with renowned multi- discipline instructor Warren Watson and I took a bunch of friends who were beginner shooters to Quail Run to shoot skeet, trap and sporting clays.
It was a gorgeous Fall day when I visited Colorado Clays to shoot with Kim Butorac and Nick and Russ Digesualdo. After the initial few shots I tinkered with the adjustable comb for a few minutes
to eliminate recoil on my face. Thereafter recoil was a non-factor.
Every shooter, irrespective of their skill level, used the word “smooth” to describe the experience of firing the Gold Target. Kim had her own highly tuned Beretta Urika Gold. Tr ying the Gold Target, she exclaimed, “Wow! Smooth. Really smooth!” Nick and Russ, both high level competition trap shooters, commented favorably on the smoothness of its swing and its outstanding balance.
One trap shooter, who returned his $80,000 matched pair of highly customized Krieghoffs to the rack to try the Gold Target, said, “This guncandoitall–itcangetyouto the top!” Although he did not offer to trade guns, using the Gold Target he consistently turned the clays into puffballs from the 16-yard line with a selection of my ammunition.
I wanted to give the Gold Target a legitimate and tough test. I’d shot thousands of rounds through a bunch of Urika and Teknys shotguns, but this one was supposed to be better. I wanted to determine if that were true.
I used an extensive array of ammunition. On the light end of the spectrum were the Winchester Xtra Lite 23/4 dram, 1 ounce 1150 fps loads and my custom hand loads used for my Damascus barrel vintage shotguns; 7/8 ounce, 1290 fps, 5500 psi, powered by 25.6 grains of IMR 7625.
On the heavy end, I loaded a few boxes of shells I deemed to be at the outer limits of sanity: 31.2 grains of Longshot that, according to the Hodgdon Manual, pushed the 1 1/8 ounces of shot at 1400 fps with 8,200 PSI. Other heavy loads included the Winchester Super Sport Sporting Clays, 11/8 ounce,
1300 fps, the Federal Handicap 1 1/8 ounce 3 dram load, the Rio high brass 1 1/4 Game load and the Fiocchi Crusher, three dram, 1300 fps, 1 ounce load.
Within these polarities I used hand loaded shells matching the 24 gram Winchester International Target loads and mid-range one- ounce loads at listed velocities of 1180 fps up to 1250 fps. I used
Hodgdon Clays, International, Longshot and IMR 7625 powders and Winchester Super Target powders.
Some additional factory loads included the Fiocchi Spreader, the Winchester Heavy Target load, the Winchester International Target load, the Fiocchi Target load and theRioTarget3dram11/8 ounce load.
Friends, Steve Griesen and Lucas Schiff, both beginner shooters, shot trap, skeet and sporting clays with me at Quail Run. Although each had their own shotguns, they did noticeably better with the Gold Target. “Really smooth,” Lucas enthused, echoing the assessments of the folks at Colorado Clays.
I and my friends fired almost one thousand rounds during the ten days we tested the gun. No matter the load or the sequence of the loads fired, not a single cycle failure occurred – even when shooting the low pressure IMR 7625 loadings. Most amazing, however, was the reduction in recoil. Using the Winchester Xtra Lite as the base for comparison of recoil, cartridges of considerably greater power yielded insignificant increases in felt recoil. For example, the 11/8 ounce 1400 fps Longshot load yielded recoil only minimally greater than the Xtra Lite load. The recoil of any load was greater with my Beretta Urika than with the Gold Target and the recoil for any load was greater yet with my over/under. It is unarguable that the Gold Target dramatically reduces felt recoil compared to my heavy over/under target gun and to my Urika, which in its own right is an inherently soft- shooting semi auto.
Not only did I feel less recoil with the Gold Target, but according to Warren’s
observations when shooting at Kiowa Creek, there was less recoil. He watched me shoot many loads, ranging from the Xra Lite on a springing teal target to the nutty 1400 fps Longshot recipe that crushed sixty-yard crossing targets. “There was no snapping back of your head,” he noted. “When shooting shotguns,” Warren said, “the first part of the body that goes is the head. That’s where the fatigue and pain and mental breakdown begin.”
This is an impressive shotgun. Peter Horn, Director of the Beretta Galler y in Manhattan, notes the success of the Gold Target is due to the high degree of personalization the user can impose without the need of a specialized gun fitter or gunsmith. It is easy to fine tune the sight picture and point of aim.
Warren Watson extolled the Gold Target’s mechanics. “The trigger is the heart and soul of the gun,” he emphasized. “The better the shooter you become, the more trigger sensitive you become. You can always depend on the quality of the Beretta semi auto trigger - they are consistently good. And Berettas are dependable. Period. They last.”
In conclusion, the Teknys Gold Target allows the shooter to transition fluidly from one target discipline to another. Offering the finest accolade for the Gold Target, Warren said, “With the adjustable comb, rib and shims, the Gold Target allows the everyday working man or woman to own a world class target breaker.” Fine praise, indeed, and well deserved in every regard. Beretta has struck gold.
- Category: Articles
- Hits: 2466
by Michael G. Sabbeth
Firearms in an estate present unique administration challenges. Beyond their obvious inherent danger, the legal and prudent treatment of firearms requires specialized knowledge and practices. The uninformed or careless fiduciary risks jeopardizing estate assets and criminal and civil liability.
A lawyer went to the home of his recently widowed client. Her deceased husband’s firearms were sprinkled through- out the home like croutons on a Caesar salad. Retrieving handguns from under couches and dresser drawers, the client waved them around the room and at the lawyer. All the handguns were loaded.
This real-life scenario illustrates one example of why the treat- ment of firearms in an estate by fiduciaries and their legal counsel transcends sophisticated legal analysis. Practical wisdom is re- quired. People could be killed.
Firearms are unique estate assets highly regulated by an aggre- gation of federal, state, and local laws. Errors and ignorance in deal- ing with them in estate administration can result in civil and crim- inal liability for the attorney, the client, and third parties, and can cause irreversible tragedy.
This article addresses definitions and classifications of firearms, persons prohibited from owning or possessing firearms, transferring firearms, appraisals, and fiduciary duties. This article does not and is not intended to advocate higher fiduciary standards of care for personal representatives and their counsel than the law currently establishes regarding the possession and transfer of firearms in the estate administration context.
A Firearm by any Other Name
The attorney should promptly inquire whether firearms—or what appear to be firearms—are among the decedent’s property. The personal representative and all family members of the dece- dent should be unambiguously advised of the importance of find- ing, securing, and identifying firearms in the estate.
If firearms are found among the estate property, the attorney should methodically begin a sequence of actions. The first step is directing a competent, knowledgeable, and qualified person— whether the personal representative or some trained person desig- nated by the personal representative—to gather, unload, and safely secure all firearms. The next step is determining the type and class of each firearm. Justice Potter Stewart may have confidently known pornography when he saw it,1 but absent expertise and perhaps in- vestigation, such confidence likely will be misplaced regarding knowing the class of some types of firearms.
Federal law defines a firearm, in part, as “any weapon (including a starter gun) which will or is designed to or may readily be con- verted to expel a projectile by the action of an explosive.”2 Colo- rado law defines a firearm as “any handgun, automatic, revolver, pis- tol, rifle, shotgun, or other instrument or device capable or intended to be capable of discharging bullets, cartridges, or other explosive charges.”3
For purposes of this article, firearms are divided into three classi- fications: National Firearms Act (NFA)4 firearms; antique fire- arms; and all other firearms. Analysis of federal firearms legislation begins with the NFA, as amended by the Gun Control Act (GCA of 1968),5 and the Firearms Owners Protection Act (FOPA of 1986).6
Identifying all NFA firearms is vital because illegal possession or transfer of an NFA firearm can lead to prison terms; substantial fines; and the forfeiture of the weapon and any vessel, vehicle, or
aircraft used to conceal or convey the firearm.7 The NFA defines several categories of firearms:
• machine guns • short-barreled rifles (SBRs) • short-barreled shotguns (SBSs) • any other weapons (AOWs) • suppressors • destructive devices (DDs).8 Under Colorado law, a “dangerous weapon” is defined in CRS
§ 18-12-102(1) as a firearm silencer, machine gun, short shotgun, short rifle, or ballistic knife. The language of the statute regarding machine guns, SBRs, and SBSs tracks the NFA.
Antique firearms are defined based on their date of manufacture and the type of ignition system used to fire a projectile. Any firearm manufactured in or before 1898 that is not designed or redesigned for using rimfire ammunition or conventional center fire ignition with fixed ammunition is an antique firearm.9 Antique firearms are not covered by the NFA. Other non-NFA firearms include the more common bolt action, lever action, pump action, and semi- automatic action rifles, shotguns, and handguns (revolvers and pis- tols). In federal and state jurisdictions, statutes for possession and transfer treat handguns differently from other firearms.
Registered NFA Firearms
Only NFA firearms such as machine guns are registered under federal law. An unregistered NFA firearm is contraband and can- not be transferred. Possession of an unregistered NFA firearm is a felony. If an NFA firearm is in the estate, the attorney must deter- mine if the firearm was lawfully registered to the decedent. The National Firearm Registration and Transfer Record (NFRTR) is the central registry of all NFA firearms in the United States that are not in the possession or under the control of the U.S. govern- ment. The registry includes: (1) the identification of the firearm; (2) the date of registration; and (3) the identification and address of the person entitled to possession of the firearm.
Registration of NFA firearms is mandatory. An exception to the registration requirement is a firearm legally brought back from a war—perhaps a captured firearm—which may be possessed legally if proper paperwork can be produced.
Persons or their fiduciaries who have firearms registered to them in the NFRTR are required to retain proof of such registration.10 Proof consists of a copy of the ATF form registering the firearm to the possessor. If the decedent’s representative is unable to locate such records, the representative may write to the NFA Branch to inquire into the registration status of the firearm. The written in- quiry should be accompanied by documents establishing the repre- sentative’s legal authority to represent the estate, such as Colorado Letters of Administration or Letters Testamentary.11
The NFRTR may be unreliable regarding accurate records. If unable to find the registration, the attorney should contact the BATFE, in writing, to determine the weapon’s status. Although ATF is prohibited from disclosing tax information (which all NFA registrations are) the ATF may disclose the owner information of the firearm to persons lawfully representing registrants of NFA firearms.
Attorney David Goldman from Jacksonville, Florida, shared an anecdote that illustrates the hazards of dealing with NFA firearms. A personal representative brought an unregistered SBR—inno- cently or otherwise—to a gun shop for appraisal. A BATFE agent
happened to be in the shop. The personal representative was arrested.
An unregistered NFA firearm cannot be registered. The NTF Handbook advises the decedent’s representative to contact an ATF office to arrange for the disposal of the firearm. Transporting the unregistered firearm without obtaining instruction from the ATF is not advised.
No economic benefit to the estate accrues when an unregistered NFA firearm is transferred to BATFE. A legally transferable regis- tered machine gun may be worth hundreds of thousands of dol- lars. The parts of an unregistered firearm also may have consider- able value. The BATFE allows for an unregistered firearm to be decommissioned into parts, thereby eliminating its character as an NFA firearm.12 In the event an unregistered NFA firearm is found, careful reading of the Handbook is recommended to become edu- cated about the decommission process.
Decommissioning the firearm may yield the estate a substantial amount of money. Some writers have hinted (although not assert- ed) that disposing of the firearm to the BATFE rather than de- commissioning it may be a breach of a fiduciary duty or even attor- ney malpractice.
It is prudent to become familiar with Colorado law on the nuances of legal versus illegal firearms. For example, in Colorado, it is unlawful to possess a defaced firearm, which is defined as a firearm where distinguishing identification marks have been re- moved.13
Federal and state laws prohibit several classes of persons from owning or possessing firearms. A primary purpose of the Gun Control Act and the Uniform Firearms Act is to prevent “prohib- ited persons” from possessing firearms. A person prohibited at the federal level is prohibited from owning or possessing a firearm in any state.
The Gun Control Act defines nine categories of prohibited per- sons. A prohibited person is one who:
. 1) is under indictment for or convicted of a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year;
. 2) is a fugitive from justice;
. 3) is an illegal drug user;
. 4) is adjudicated mentally defective;
. 5) is an illegal alien;
. 6) has been dishonorably discharged from the U.S. military;
. 7) has renounced his or her U.S. citizenship;
. 8) is under a restraining order against harassing, stalking, or in- timidating an intimate partner or child; and
. 9) has been convicted of a crime of domestic violence.14
Transfers of Firearms
The main considerations regarding transfers of firearms are un- ambiguous: no prohibited person may receive a firearm and the transfer of an NFA firearm must be authorized by the BATFE. Only a person, including a personal representative, qualified under federal and state law may legally posses a firearm. Firearms trans- fers in most cases will be mundane and have little risk of conflict- ing with federal and state law or being infused with liability concerns. Some transfers, however, may be cause for trepidation and scrutiny.
The transfer of an NFA firearm is defined as the “selling, assign- ing, pledging, leasing, loaning, giving away, or otherwise disposing of an NFA firearm.15 This definition is applicable to the transfer of any firearm, including non-NFA firearms. Federal law prohibits a person from selling or disposing of any firearm or ammunition to any person prohibited from possessing or receiving a firearm if the transferor knows or has reasonable cause to believe that the re- cipient of the firearm is legally prohibited from possessing or re- ceiving firearms.16
Two classes of people are relevant when discussing transfers: a federal firearms-licensed dealer (FFL dealer)17 and a non-licens- ee. Typically, a personal representative and the attorney are not FFL dealers. An FFL dealer as transferor has greater legal duties than a non-licensed transferor. For a non-FFL transferor (the typ- ical case) no duty exists to determine whether the intended recipi- ent is a prohibited person. Absent knowledge or a reasonable ba- sis to believe the recipient is a prohibited person, a transfer of a non-NFA firearm may take place.
An FFL dealer must perform a state InstaCheck (background check) on the intended transferee. The intended transferee must be approved before the transfer from the FFL dealer to the trans- feree can occur. In Colorado, this process is done through the Colorado Bureau of Investigations.18
A non-FFL dealer licensee intrastate transfer of a non-NFA firearm to a non-FFL dealer licensee does not require an Insta- Check. (As discussed above, an NFA firearm transfer has addi- tional restrictions.) The transfer remains subject to the operative mental state of knowing or having cause to believe that the trans- feree is a prohibited person.
Distribution of an NFA firearm to an heir or beneficiary quali- fied under local, state, and federal law is a transfer and must be done in accordance with the NFA. Before the firearm may be law- fully transferred, approval from BATFE must be obtained by fil- ing an application to transfer and register the firearm. The trans- fer may be completed without payment of the generally applicable $200 transfer tax.19
If the NFA firearm is being transferred to a dealer rather than to an heir or beneficiary, a BATFE Form 4 must be completed, a tax paid, and approval obtained. Transfer of an NFA firearm by auction can be done only through an auction house licensed to possess NFA firearms. Although beyond the scope of this article, an auction house can transfer an NFA firearm only to a qualified person approved by the BATFE.
The fiduciaries (personal representative and attorney) must safely secure firearms, identify their type, and understand transfer laws for each class of firearm. The attorney may wish to take possession of the firearms during the estate administration process if the per- sonal representative cannot or chooses not to do so. However, when doing so, extreme caution is urged on the part of the attorney for a number of reasons, including potential liability for accidents, theft, and damage.
The attorney accepting possession of firearms must be a quali- fied person. Indeed, the prudent personal representative might de- mand a background check of the attorney. If neither the personal representative nor the attorney is willing to take possession of the
firearms, the attorney should petition the court for the appoint- ment of a special personal representative empowered solely to pos- sess and transfer the firearms. In either scenario, adequate insur- ance for the firearms should be acquired. When dealing with firearms, the fiduciaries, particularly the personal representative, have unique duties that transcend the general obligations to mar- shal and inventory the assets, evaluate them, and distribute the property or proceeds from the sale of property to the proper bene- ficiaries.
Practice Tips and Hypotheticals
The following discussion presents practical considerations relat- ing to the types of firearms that may confront the fiduciary and applications of the laws that should influence the decisions of the prudent fiduciary. Recall that a non-licensee transfer of a firearm to another non-licensee does not require a determination that the recipient is not a prohibited person. That is the law, but it may not be prudent fiduciary behavior.
ØThe fiduciary must know whether a firearm can be distrib- uted to a beneficiary in the beneficiary’s venue. For example, an assault-type weapon cannot be distributed in California, and a handgun can be distributed in Pennsylvania only to a person with an appropriate license.
Unless the fiduciary has a high degree of confidence regarding the legal status of the beneficiary, it is recommended that the fidu- ciary receive from each beneficiary or other transferee a notarized document that lists all the prohibited categories mentioned above and requires the intended transferee to sign under oath that the transferee is not disqualified by any of the prohibited categories. The highest level of protection is to have all transfers conducted through an FFL dealer, if justified by circumstances, such as the ex- istence of beneficiaries the fiduciary does not know or where trans- fers are made to non-beneficiaries who are strangers to the estate. Some practitioners routinely advise clients to use FFL dealers in all but the most conservative instances.The fiduciary can ask a fed- eral firearms dealer to do a background check; the fee for such service is nominal.
ØA common scenario occurs when the sale of a decedent’s gun collection is advertised by e-mail among friends and is held at the decedent’s home. Often, however, many strangers show up at the home and some buy firearms. Sales and transfers in the home can be legal but they might not be prudent. Although there is no duty to inquire as to whether the purchaser is qualified, a purchaser may be under the influence of alcohol or drugs. The issue is risk man- agement rather than technical legal compliance.
An extreme example would arise if the personal representative affixed posters to neighborhood telephone poles advertising “Estate Sale of Guns at Joe’s House” or if the sale was announced on Twitter or Facebook. Although technical legal compliance with transfers may have occurred, if a prohibited person acquired a firearm and then committed a crime, expensive litigation against the estate and fiduciaries likely would ensue and no prudent lawyer could guaran- tee an outcome favorable to the estate or its fiduciaries.
ØA fiduciary bringing a firearm to an FFL dealer (often a gun shop) for consignment is deemed a transfer, as is an appraisal if the dealer takes possession of the firearm. If sometime before the expi- ration of the consignment or appraisal period the fiduciary became a prohibited person, the dealer cannot transfer the firearm back to the fiduciary. In such an instance, the personal representative must leave the firearm for sale, sell the firearm to the dealer at perhaps an improvident price, or petition the court to appoint a special fi- duciary to legally take possession of the firearm.
ØA seemingly harmless scenario that dramatically illustrates the vulnerability of fiduciaries when dealing with firearms can innocuously arise if the personal representative allows a benefici- ary or potential non-beneficiary purchaser to shoot the firearm for reasons as mundane as to determine whether the gun “fits” or whether the purchaser can handle the recoil. If the firearm is a vin- tage shotgun with Damascus steel barrels, a not uncommon firearm among collectors or that are handed down from previous generations, the shotgun likely cannot safely discharge modern high-pressure ammunition. It is quite likely the Damascus barrels will explode on firing one or more of such cartridges, possibly caus- ing injury or death to the shooter and to others in proximity. More- over, the destruction of an estate asset possibly worth tens of thou- sands of dollars would result.
If an injury occurred, the fiduciary who supplied such modern ammunition to the shooter or who failed to expressly inform the shooter not to use such ammunition exposes the estate, as well as himself or herself, to liability, probably without a right of contribu- tion or indemnification from the estate. Simply stated, the fiduciary dealing with firearms has to know what he or she is doing, and so should the attorney advising the fiduciary. As a general proposi- tion, the fiduciary and the attorney should be on notice to seek in- put from an expert if either or both lack the high degree of knowl- edge required when dealing with firearms.
ØThe fiduciary does not want his or her actions to result in harm to a beneficiary or to family or friends. For example, assume a fiduciary transfers a firearm to a nonprohibited beneficiary who lives with a prohibited person. A risk of criminal liability of the prohibited person can arise under the theory of constructive pos- session if the beneficiary does not properly isolate the firearm.
As a general rule, the nonprohibited person retains a Second Amendment right to possess or own a firearm, but does have a duty to prevent access to the firearm by the prohibited person. In United States v. Huet, the court stated:
[B]ans on felon possession of firearms also affect their law- abiding spouses, girlfriends and boyfriends, and other house- mates: Those people might be unable to safely possess guns in their homes because of the possibility that their felon housemate will be seen as ‘constructive[ly] possess[ing]’ the gun, and that they themselves will therefore be seen as criminally aiding this illegal possession.” There are limits on the constructive posses- sion doctrine (at least in the view of many courts), for instance if the housemate keeps the gun locked in a combination-locked safe.20
Also, under certain facts, the nonprohibited beneficiary might become criminally liable for permitting the possession of a firearm by a prohibited person. Although no fiduciary breach of duty would have occurred by transferring a firearm to a qualified trans- feree, and although the consequences of such a transfer are beyond the scope of the fiduciary’s duty, the prudent fiduciary should be aware of such possibilities and consider implementing an alternative asset distribution plan.
ØAlthough a beneficiary who is a prohibited person cannot possess a bequeathed firearm, he or she does retain a property right in it. Thus, the estate may be required to sell the firearm and give the beneficiary the proceeds or substituted property of equal value. In the alternative, the non-qualified beneficiary could give the firearm to someone else, as long as he or she never gains possession of the firearm.
Ø When distributing firearms, the fiduciary has a duty of loyalty to the estate and its beneficiaries. Distribution of firearms must be fair and not self-serving, as in the instance that could arise where a personal representative is a beneficiary and has knowledge of the value of firearms equal to or greater than other beneficiaries. A dis- cussion of this issue took place in the unpublished opinion in The Matter of the Estate of Howell. There, the Delaware Chancery Court concluded:
They challenge Jon’s allocation of the firearms. The values of the firearms were set by a friend and social acquaintances of Jon, and he then, exercising his fiduciary powers, selected for himself the firearms that he wanted based on those valuations. In essence, Sue and Lynn argue that if Jon is to use his power to allocate the firearms, he must obtain an independent valuation of the firearms. Alternatively, if appraisals by Jon’s friends and acquain- tances are to be used, then they should be entitled to select from the collection (perhaps after having first had a full and fair opportunity to have them valued by an appraiser).
By picking the more valuable firearms, presumably the true “collectible” firearms, Jon carried out a strategy that raises seri- ous questions as to the fairness and impartiality of the distribu- tion process. If Jon had set the value for the various firearms himself, it is clear that the approach he chose could not with- stand even a superficial duty of loyalty analysis.
Therefore, in light of all the circumstances and, in particular, Jon’s decision to distribute to himself the more valuable firearms, I find that Jon’s approach to valuing and distributing the guns was not consistent with his duty of loyalty and was unfair to his beneficiaries.21
The personal representative may hire appraisers to evaluate estate property.22 The rules defining fair market value for house- hold and personal effects appear in Internal Revenue Code (Code) § 20.2031-6(a):
The fair market value . . . is the price which a willing buyer would pay to a willing seller, neither being under any compul- sion to buy or to sell and both having reasonable knowledge of relevant facts.23
This section also describes the requirements for taking inventories and the fiduciary obligations to affirm the evaluations. Section 20.2031-6(b) defines the value thresholds for requiring a valuation:
Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (a) of this section, if there are included among the household and personal effects articles having marked artistic or intrinsic value of a total value in excess of $3,000 . . . the appraisal of an expert or experts, under oath, shall be filed with the return. . . .
The vast majority of the millions of firearms in households are more or less fungible and the markets are well established. De- pending on conditions, values can be established with a high de- gree of accuracy and consistency over the years. However, many firearms are relatively rare and unique. The value of custom or rare, vintage firearms can be stunning. Firearms from some custom makers of sporting arms, for example, cost from hundreds of thou- sands to in excess of $1 million.
Value is determined by an array of variables. The prestige of an engraver, for example, can add as much as $100,000 to a firearm’s value. Slight dents and scratches on these “high-grade” or “best” firearms can significantly reduce value.
Of course, the time limitation for selling the firearms will sub- stantially influence their sales price. The resale of some custom or “bespoke” firearms may occur in an hour, or may take years. If bene- ficiaries want their money immediately, they will receive sales offers at considerably less than what might be offered within a lengthier span of time when the fiduciary is determined to maximize value to the estate. The valuation process is far more art than science when dealing with firearms in these very limited niche markets.
If the estate is not taxable and the filing of a federal estate tax return is not required, no appraisal is required. However, for rea- sons beyond the scope of this article, even if an estate tax return is not technically required, under some circumstances, it might be prudent to get appraisals, file an estate return, and start the statute of limitations regarding the finality of the evaluations for the bene- ficiaries’ tax basis.
The dangerous consequences of unsafely handling firearms are self-evident. Less obvious are the financial and criminal conse- quences from wrongful possession and transfers of certain types of firearms and the wrongful possession and transfer of firearms gen-
erally to persons prohibited from owning, possessing, or control- ling them.
The inherent lethal nature of firearms places great demands on fiduciaries and their advisors. The failure to fulfill those demands can result in catastrophic physical harm and incalculable economic damage. This article is a starting point for the prudent fiduciary and counsel, who should be motivated to ask proper questions, evaluate answers, and seek knowledgeable guidance. The goal is to enable fiduciaries to treat firearms in an estate respectfully and in- telligently, thereby reducing the likelihood of harm to fiduciaries and to those relying on their judgment and wisdom and, of course, to enhance society’s safety.
1. Jacobellis v. Ohio, 378 U.S. 184 (1964).
2. 18 U.S.C. § 921 (a) (3). See also Prince, “Grandpop’s Machine Gun in the Chest,” available at blog.princelaw.com/2007/9/25/grandpop-s- machine-gun-in-the-chest (describing other National Firearms Act (NFA) firearms, such as “all other weapons” and suppressors, and difficul- ties that can arise when trying to identify them). See generally U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (BATFE), National Firearms Handbook 59 ( June 2007), available at www.atf.gov/firearms/nfa/ nfa_handbook); www.atf.gov/firearms/guides/identification-of-nfa- fireamrs.html (information for determining whether a firearm is an NFA firearm).
3. CRS § 18-1-901(h).
4. 26 U.S.C.S. §§ 5801 to 5872; 73 P. L. No. 474, 48 Stat. 1236. BATFE provides some identification assistance with www.atf.gov/docs/ Identification_of_Firearms_pt1.pdf and www.atf.gov/docs/Identification_ of_Firearms_pt2.pdf.
5. 90 P. L. 618, 82 Stat. 1235, 921. 6. 18 U.S.C. § 922(o)(1); 99 P.L. 308, 100 Stat. 452, 102(9). 7. 26 U.S.C.S. §§ 5861(d) and (j) and 5872; 49 U.S.C.S. §§ 781 to
788. 8. 26 U.S.C.S. §§ 5801 to 5872; 73 P. L. No. 474, 48 Stat. 1236). A
short-barreled rifle (SBR), for example, is defined in part as a firearm “hav- ing a barrel or barrels of less than 16 inches in length or an overall length of less than 26 inches.” An SBS is defined in part as “having a barrel less than 18 inches or has an overall length of less than 26 inches.” Instructions for measuring the barrels are contained within the definitions.
9. 26 U.S.C. § 5845. 10. 26 U.S.C. § 5841(e); 27 C.F.R. § 479.101(e) 11. The address of the NFA Branch is: BATFE, National Firearms Act
Branch, 244 Needy Rd., Martinsburg, WV 25405. 12. See generally BAFTE, supra note 1 at 58 and Appendix B (ATF
Rulings 2003-1, 2003-2, 2003-3, and 2003-4). 13. CRS § 18-12-103. 14. 18 U.S.C. § 992(d). 15. 26 U.S.C. § 5845(j).
16. 18 U.S.C. § 922(d)(1) to (9). 17. 18 U.S.C. § 921 (a). 18. See cbi.state.co.us/ic. 19. 26 U.S.C. § 5811. See generally BATFE website, www.atf.gov. 20. United States v. Huet, No. 08-0215 (W.D.Penn., Nov. 22, 2010),
available at scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=9612442952507442301 &q=us+v.+huet&hl=en&as_sdt=2,6&as_vis=1. See volokh.com/2010/ 11/24/second-amendment-protects-gun-possession-by-the-housemates- of-felons. See also State v. Caekaert, 983 P. 2d. 332 (Mont. 1999).
21. Estate of Howell, Nos. 117657, Civ. A. 17760-NC. (Del. Ch. Feb. 12, 2002 )
22. CRS § 15-12-706. 23. IRC, Chap. 1, Subchap. B, Part 20.